UPDATED: Richard Gilbert Speaks about Romney's "Crime Syndicate" - and our Duty as Ron Paul Supporters
Submitted by robot999 on Sat, 07/28/2012 - 12:03Richard Gilbert speaks about Romney's "Crime Syndicate" (his lying, cheating, stealing of the election), and Romney's support of NDAA, Drones, and other Evils.
He goes on to talk about the Duty of Ron Paul supporters to fight until the battle is over (win or lose) to restore the US Constitution by electing Ron Paul POTUS.
Now that the Campaign has officially challenged the Oregon, Louisiana, and Mass. delegate "results" (achieved by outright criminal activity by Romney and local GOP thugs), maybe you can think about supporting Richard, his team, and our Lawsuit against the RNC, and State GOP Chairmen - seeking to unbind the Delegates in Tampa!!
(Unbind by court order - not by some GOP rule or "promise" - which they have proven time and again can be broken when convenient.)
P.S. Have you ever considered that there just might be information and a plan to elect RP that you don't know about? Don't give up, keep fighting!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bK5cqAoYwTU&feature=colike
UPDATE: Listen to what Carol Paul has to say about the LFRP and the lawsuit (approx 4:20)
http://youtu.be/tDruewydBUs
Veterans for Ron Paul!
- Login to post comments
The RNC lawyer indicted
The RNC lawyer indicted himself when forced to answer to the judge that he indeed breaks his own party rules. The judge was not pleased by this.
Richard will be filing today, 8,8,2012, the Amended Complaint.
The Judge has given Richard a road map to award the Plaintiff the relief under protection Voting Rights Act of 1971.
meaning also that the RNC may still be in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1971.
This could mean that Rmoney may have ZERO bound delegates.
That's right, I said Rmoney with NO BOUND DELEGATES.
Just give that a thought. I can understand WHY RNC/Rmoney trolls would bash this lawsuit.
So, go ahead an vote this comment down.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
Dont Quote Me - Listen if you dare
Attorney Gilbert in his own words Radio Show 8-8-2012
Guest Richard Gilbert, Attorney for 400+ Delegates vs RNC
by Jeenyus Corner Live
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/jeenyus-corner-radio/2012/08/08...
-------
Does the negative votes indicate that you listened to the radio show? or that when you see TheKnowBuddies it is that simple mouse click?
It really does not matter, there is no name attached to the mouse click, anonymous I guess.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
Yep, I listened to the stupid show
It is Richard Gilbert, the same dumbass who can't even successfully FILE an "intelligible" complaint.
The judge was practically holdng his hand and said "last chance, pal".
So, is the amended (...amended) complaint any more specific?
No. It's actually LESS specific than the 1st Amended Complaint.
EPIC FAIL DR. GILBERT
☧ INSTINCTV • DIVINITATIS • MENTIS • MAGNITVDINE ☧
Listen to the new show before you criticize
From yesterday:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ronpaulgirl/2012/08/10/live-int...
@0:52:05 "You know what? I'm happy to present the amended complaint which I prepared two months ago by the way because I knew there was going to be an amended complaint. My twitter followers and I, we have this three-dimensional chess game we're playing and when say we have three-dimensional chess what we mean by that is we prepared three complaints. We knew there were going to be three complaints. Because each step of the way we had to get the RNC to position A, position B, and now the final position to get them ready for the knockout punch."
He's got them right where he wants them, just you wait and see.
"You decide." -- Judge Napolitano http://youtu.be/D5J84fWqEK0
And soon we're all going to ascend into 5D with UFO's too....
Right.
You know what, I've had enough of this nonsense.
I do not know what Richard Gilbert is doing with these lawsuits, all I know is they are designed to harm the liberty movement. Whether deliberately(likely) or unintentionally (more likely), he is stirring up controversy for freedom lovers.
No legal precedent, no case laws and nothing to prove his court case. You bring videos and affidavits to a legal battleground, not empty words and names.
Typical
Get a better writer.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
Well you always bring videos and affidavits into a court room...
Not empty threats and names.
This is a deadly serious issue. Shouldn't Gilbert treat it like one?
And you are making me play 15-dimensional chess
15-D. That's 15 Damned times I would probably have to repeat myself –that yes, I heard the interview. And let me guess, he's only appearing to be a bumbling idiot, so as to deceive the RNC lawyers, am I right?
Then I have only 1 question for you:
Q: Of what benefit is it, to be deceiving the Judge as well?
☧ INSTINCTV • DIVINITATIS • MENTIS • MAGNITVDINE ☧
You're like a turtle hiding in a shell
He knew you were going to write that, you know. You think you're playing 15-dimensional chess but in fact the L4RP is solving a 99-dimension sudoku. In pen.
Check it out. He had the appeal written before the judge even asked for it, and you should be grateful because it has freed up his time to save Earth. I refer you to his twitter feed. An alien race has revealed to a NASA scientist that the magnetic poles for our planet will be shifting in 2016 and we will be bombarded with deadly cosmic rays. Thankfully the L4RP has already set everything in motion to give Ron Paul the nomination and the presidency, so he had time to work out a plan to keep the deadly cosmic waves from wiping out 90% of the life on our planet.
His plan is brilliance in its simplicity. First, he says "chemtrails must be part of the plan." Well, obviously. But that alone is not enough: "We will still need a gravitational force from Space to draw particles into space". For that, he proposes thousands of blimp-like spaceships made of carbon fibers and filled with helium-3, built in outer space to provide the gravitational pull needed to draw those deadly particles away from Earth and back into outer space. Could you have come up with a solution like that? I know I couldn't have thought of such a thing in a million years! For him it was all in a day's tweets.
"You decide." -- Judge Napolitano http://youtu.be/D5J84fWqEK0
I gave up on this place
Along with Olson & Benton - But not Dr. Paul, God bless him.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
haha
For a moment on this thread, I thought you were serious. Richard Gilbert's Twitter feed yesterday was a mess. He has gone from defender of the delegates to defender of Earth.
too bad the judge is just going to throw it out now
You don't get time for a knockout punch when the judge tells you that you have one final chance to submit something with substance and specificity, and you submit a document that removes the only claim the judge said was even intelligible in the first place.
did you listen to the show?
If you had listened to the show you would know that the judge *did not return* the videos and affidavits. Obviously, as Gilbert points out, the judge is still reviewing and considering that evidence. So it may not be written into the amended complaint, but it's all still in front of the judge. And the judge is probably also pondering some of the points of law that he was apparently unfamiliar with and that Gilbert had to explain, as you would know if you had listened.
The judge may think he understands what's going on, but in reality he's playing catch-up while Gilbert anticipated *all* of these moves *months* in advance. I mean, come on. Gilbert wrote the amended appeal two months before the judge even asked for it! If that doesn't convince you about what's really going on with this lawsuit then nothing will.
"You decide." -- Judge Napolitano http://youtu.be/D5J84fWqEK0
What is this? Judge? A FAKE WOODEN NICKEL?
Submitted by TheKnowBuddies on Mon, 08/13/2012 - 11:51. Permalink
Preamble in RNC Rule Book:
-------------------------------
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Republican Party is the party of the open door. Ours is the party of liberty, the party of equality, of opportunity for all, and favoritism for none.
It is the intent and purpose of these rules to encourage and allow the broadest possible participation of all voters in the Republican Party activities at all levels and to assure that the Republican Party is open and accessible to all Americans.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the following be and hereby are adopted as The Rules of the Republican Party,composed of the rules for the election and government of the Republican National Committee until the next national convention, the rules under which delegates and alternate delegates shall be allotted to the respective states in the next national convention, and the rules under which such delegates and alternate delegates shall be elected and under which contests shall be considered, and the rules of business of this national convention.
-----------------------------------------------
Sounds So Official, but, What is it?
A charter, promise, measure of good faith, guarantee, contract, sales tool,
Contract Pledge Assured Purpose mission statement honest pledge of artificial promise put-on goal proposal undertaking ploy scheme racket bogus snake oil racket deceit trick scam deception dupe smoke and mirrors hoodwink con defraud cheat get or…..a fake wooden nickel?
"Ironic". Oath keepers, to preserve the constitution, if we totally lose the Constitution, how much need will there be for Judges. Reminds me of the opening of the Beatles movie "Help", "If we lose the congregation, No more me."
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
That's awesome, maybe he can have that printed in huge letters
on the sides of those helium-filled blimps he wants to assemble in outer space to gravitationally remove cosmic rays from our atmosphere to avoid the disaster that space aliens predicted will occur in 2016.
"You decide." -- Judge Napolitano http://youtu.be/D5J84fWqEK0
All downvotes from me to you on this thread
have been corrected to +1, now that I realize who I'm speaking with.
If Gilbert's the world's foremost expert in high-dimensional sudoku, then I'm playing 8-dimensional Octonionic Nixie-Tube Kakuro.
☧ INSTINCTV • DIVINITATIS • MENTIS • MAGNITVDINE ☧
Off topic
Typical
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
No I did not
But I read the complaint, the judge's decision, and the amended complaint. The judge was highly critical of Richard Gilbert in his decision. Unless he is crazy, Gilbert did not intentionally write the complaint in such a way that a judge would mock him like that. And I don't know why he didn't do anything the judge asked him to do when writing the amended complaint. He was brilliant enough to have a rewrite ready, but not brilliant enough to include any of the information the judge criticized him for not including the first time around. His prescience has limitations.
sounds good...
sounds good...
BS. Georgia and Maine already proved violation of Voting Rights.
Georgia and Maine already proved violation of the Voting Rights act 1971, using their own responsible, constitutionally qualified lawyers.
They even admitted the act was violated.
And here Richard Gilbert is making frivolous allegations without showing documented proof of broken bones, attendees forced to sign legal perjury waivers or other required evidence necessary for any judge - including Judge Carter - to make a legitimate decision.
He is all talk, no action. Not a single shred of proof has been offered from his team of the "violations", in spite of there being too many numerous to count. And also Gilbert never mentions Romney's partner Michael Herzog, who's turning evidence against him in court. Why is that?
http://tdarkcabal.blogspot.com/2012/04/april-27-2012-white-h...
http://s19.postimage.org/oq93ddi9d/Confirm1.jpg
http://www.myspace.com/tom_heneghan_intel/blog/545639133
None of the delegates shall be bound, none of them. They are never forced to vote for anyone. Unless you actually believe a piece of paper is going to intimidate & silence voters to vote their conscience at the main event....this is all smoke & mirrors.
Where can we find info about GA and ME?
I haven't heard anything, anywhere.
Yeah, don't think so.
You can't file an amended complaint if the case has been dismissed without prejudice.
Vote down if court decision is falsely quoted
In ref to above:
"You can't file an amended complaint if the case has been dismissed without prejudice."
From the court decision:
"For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. However, the Court dismisses WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will afford Plaintiffs a third and final opportunity to attempt to sufficiently plead a violation of Section 1971(b) of the Voting Rights Act"
Here is how you check it:
Reference Court Decision PDF: Scribd http://www.scribd.com/embeds/102312914/content?view_mode=lis...
IT IS IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE -
UPDATE:
The Amended Complaint has been filed 8-8-2012 - 41 pages and is NOW available here:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B42o0yg7D7tcYlRNTWtCWWNKdFE/...
Please note Amended complaint, Page 25, starting on line 10.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
I don't think so
I have a hard to believing the attorney admitted that he "breaks his own party rules." In fact, I don't believe. What evidence do you have?
Good indication to be proven.
The Amended Complaint has been filed 8-8-2012 - 41 pages and is NOW available here:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B42o0yg7D7tcYlRNTWtCWWNKdFE/...
Please note Amended complaint, Page 25, starting on line 10.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
Liberty Delegates vs RNC Lawsuit Update
A RP supporter was at the hearing and what you don't believe is on the court record.
http://onesquarelight.wordpress.com/2012/08/07/liberty-deleg...
Further,
Below is the Ruling Issued by Judge Carter 08-07-2012
“For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. However, the Court dismisses WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Court will afford Plaintiffs a third and final opportunity to attempt to sufficiently plead a violation of Section 1971(b) of theVoting Rights Act.See Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co., 806 F.2d 1393,1401 (9th Cir. 1986).
Because the Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Court also DENIES Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application to Expedite Trial [16].
Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint, if at all, on or before August 20, 2012.
DATED: August 7, 2012 __________________________________ DAVID O. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 8:12-cv-00927-DOC-JPR Document 35 Filed
08/07/12 Page 20 of 20 Page ID #:492 “
------------------------
Plaintiff cannot file another amended complaint?
That is not what I read.
Go ahead and vote this comment down.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
What record?
It's not in the opinion. I read the whole thing.
I don't believe it. What evidence do you have that the attorney said he "breaks his own party rules?"
The fact is, he didn't say that, which is why you can't prove it.
What Record?
When there is a court hearing the court will have a person (stenographer/court recorder) who will record all dialog between the parties, unless dialog is stricken by the Judge. When this dialog is recorded it is then considered "on the record" and becomes part of public record and is accessible in the transcript of the proceedings.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
The inverse of your statement.
"The fact is, he didn't say that, which is why you can't prove it."
Is the above a correct quote? Where you state, "The FACT IS"
Please give source for "Fact".
The inverse: Can you prove that he did NOT say that?
If I were to purchase a transcript and it included that subject matter regarding the RNC changing and violating their own rules then it could be proven. There IS an avenue to proof, therefore, "you can't prove it" is different than "it is yet to be proven" (to you)and to say "He did not say that" one would have to assume that The Attorney for the Plaintiff would just make this stuff up and report it on Ron Paul Radio.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheKnowBuddies
Ugh.
If you can prove it, then do it.
Very simple.